B.V. Raman's autobiographical journey through 60 years of Vedic astrology practice.
Part 3 · Series: Foundational & Learning Topics
The Ancient Teacher: Suryanarayana Siddhanti
Before the age of computers, ephemerides printed by Western publishers, or instant calculations via astronomical software, students of astrology had to master a completely different approach. They studied under living masters who carried centuries of astronomical knowledge in their heads and could calculate planetary positions from first principles using ancient mathematical methods.
For B.V. Raman, one such teacher was Suryanarayana Siddhanti, a scholar deeply versed in Hindu astronomy and astrology. Under his guidance, Raman received what he himself acknowledged as "a good grounding in Hindu astronomy which as years passed on enabled me to understand well modern astronomy."
The Dangers of Specialized Knowledge
Interestingly, even in those times, there was folklore about the risks of certain astrological pursuits. Raman recalls his grandfather's belief that doing panchanga (almanac) calculations could bring hardship.
"Grandfather's opinion that panchanga calculations should not be done by householders. He cited his own case that he was childless as he had done a lot of 'probing' into the planetary movements. Many beliefs such as this, held by a section of the educated public, cannot of course be given credence. But, it has been within my knowledge that some of the astronomers, whose sole profession was panchanga calculation, have met with serious calamities, besides suffering poverty."
Whether one accepts the supernatural explanation or not, Raman's observation about the poverty of panchanga calculators is historically accurate. These specialists, despite possessing invaluable knowledge, often remained economically vulnerable because their skills were not broadly valued outside of priestly and astrological circles.
Learning Through Real Case Studies
One of the most valuable aspects of studying under masters like the Siddhanti was access to real charts and real predictions. Raman provides a detailed case study from his learning period, demonstrating how he and his teacher analyzed a widow's chart.
"Taking all these into consideration I concluded that the native is bound to become a widow. But when? Ketu is the villain of the piece as he is in the 8th from the Moon and the dispositor Saturn is in the 12th. Therefore widowhood is indicated in Saturn's major period and Rahu's sub-period as Rahu aspects the 8th."
The Siddhanti came to a similar conclusion but with a different timing. They presented their analyses to Raman's grandfather, the ultimate authority, who provided the actual outcome.
"The Siddhandi also worked on the chart and came, more or less, to a similar conclusion. He said that the husband would die in the major period of Mercury and the sub-period of Rahu. After listening to both of us grandfather said, 'Look here, both of you are partly correct. The finding given by you is incorrect in regard to both the Dasa and the sub-Dasa. The finding of the Siddhanti is correct only so far as the Dasa is concerned. Actually the native became a widow in her 19th year, when Ketu in Mercury was operating.'"
Building International Networks
As Raman developed his knowledge and skills, he began reaching out beyond India to connect with Western astrologers. These connections would prove invaluable in spreading the knowledge of Hindu astrology to the English-speaking world and in refining his own understanding through dialogue with other systems.
"Vivian E. Robson, a well-known author and admirer of Hindu Astrology, was in frequent correspondence with me. He presented me with five books he had written on western Astrology. He sought my assistance to prepare a few articles on Ashtakavarga for publication in the 'British Journal of Astrology' edited by Mr. E.H. Bailey."
Through these correspondences with scholars like Robson, E.H. Bailey, and others, Raman contributed a series of articles on Kalatrabhava (the 7th house of marriage) to international publications. He was establishing himself as an authority on Hindu astrology at a time when such knowledge was almost completely unknown in the West.
The Meeting in London
The culmination of decades of correspondence came in 1959 when Raman traveled to London and met face-to-face with E.H. Bailey and other Western scholars. Bailey, who had been corresponding with him for years, appreciated not just Raman's knowledge but his dedication.
"It was indeed a pleasure for me to meet him in 1959 at London. He attended my lecture and appreciated what he called my 'dedication to Astrology'."
This moment represented a validation of everything Raman had studied—without modern tools, working from ancient texts, learning from living masters, and building his knowledge through patient observation and correspondence.
The Rigorous Methods of Ancient Astronomy
What modern astrologers sometimes forget is that learning traditional astrology required mastery of detailed mathematical and astronomical principles. The Surya Siddhanta contains complex formulas and methods that must be memorized and practiced until they become intuitive. This depth of training meant that astrologers of Raman's era could not simply "consult their notes"—they had to genuinely understand the underlying principles.
The Practice of Horary Astrology
Beyond textual study and calculated charts, Raman's learning included the practice of Prasna (horary) astrology—answering questions by casting a chart for the moment when the question is asked. This requires immediate skill and cannot be learned from books alone.
"Immediately I noted the time, mentally calculated the chart for it and started interpreting it. As a student I would everyday look into the panchanga and record in my memory the planetary positions for the day. This habit stood me in good stead now."
Raman's practice of reviewing the panchanga daily and memorizing planetary positions was not obsessive behavior but a necessary discipline for someone who needed to perform calculations mentally and immediately. Modern astrologers with computer access might find this remarkable, but it was the standard method of the time.
From Memory to Mastery
The case study of a man worried about his son demonstrates the fruit of this training. When presented with a question in September 1932, Raman immediately calculated the chart and diagnosed the problem:
"The date was 2nd September 1932 and the time around 2 p.m. Sagittarius was rising. In such cases I always looked for the positions of malefics and the Moon... Lord of the 2nd in the 2nd was favourable. Finance was ruled out... I relied on my good luck and the above combination and boldly declared 'The 5th house is involved at the time you put me the query. Therefore, the problem is your...'"
This demonstrates the integration of textual knowledge, practical experience, mathematical skill, and intuitive interpretation that characterizes true astrological mastery.
Key Takeaways: Learning Without Modern Tools
What This Part Teaches Us:
- Depth over convenience: The lack of modern tools forced astrologers to develop deeper understanding of astronomical and astrological principles. This created a foundation that could not be shaken by changes in technology.
- Mentorship is irreplaceable: Learning from living masters like Suryanarayana Siddhanti provided immediate feedback and correction that cannot be obtained from books alone.
- Practical experience validates theory: Real case studies, like the widow prediction, taught Raman the limitations of textual knowledge and the necessity of refined judgment.
- International exchange enriches knowledge: Raman's correspondence with Western astrologers exposed him to alternative perspectives and helped him articulate and defend Hindu astrological principles.
- Memory is a tool of mastery: Daily study of planetary positions, mental calculation, and the ability to immediately cast horary charts all required cultivating memory as a tool of practice.
- Specialization has costs: Even as specialized knowledge was valued, those who possessed it often struggled economically. The value of knowledge is not always reflected in financial reward.
The absence of computers and modern tools during Raman's learning years was not a handicap but a crucible that forged deeper understanding. Today, when students have access to all the computational tools they could want, the challenge is not accessing information but developing the wisdom to interpret it. In that sense, Raman's generation faced a different challenge—learning without technology—and they met it with commitment, discipline, and patient study under the feet of masters.